Paul Scholes has reportedly said, naming one summer signing as the club’s worst transfer ever
Manchester United have seen their fair share of questionable transfers over the years, but if Paul Scholes is to be believed, one recent deal stands head and shoulders above the rest for all the wrong reasons.
The former United midfielder has reportedly delivered a blistering verdict on a summer signing, describing the player as the worst acquisition the club has ever made. The comments, which have rippled through Old Trafford and beyond, rank among the most scathing assessments ever offered by a United legend.
Scholes, renowned for his blunt honesty and refusal to sugarcoat the truth, is said to have expressed outright regret over the deal. He reportedly admitted that he wishes the transfer had never happened, claiming that in the long history of Manchester United, no signing has disappointed him more. In his view, the player has offered nothing close to a return on the club’s heavy financial investment and represents a complete misuse of resources.
The frustration is heightened by the expectations that surrounded the arrival. The player joined amid huge excitement, backed by a sizeable transfer fee, lucrative wages, and glowing claims about experience, leadership, and quality. Many believed he would play a key role in United’s rebuild and help restore standards at the club. Instead, months on, the optimism has evaporated.
Critics argue that the signing has failed on multiple fronts. Performances have been erratic, the intensity demanded at United has appeared overwhelming, and the pressure of playing at Old Trafford seems to have taken its toll. For a club with such a demanding history, falling so far short of expectations is something Scholes clearly finds unacceptable.
What appears to hurt most is that, in Scholes’ eyes, this transfer represents more than just an individual failure. It has become a symbol of deeper issues that have plagued United in recent years — flawed recruitment, questionable decision-making, large sums spent with little impact, and a gradual erosion of the standards that once defined the club.
Unsurprisingly, the comments have sparked fierce debate among supporters. Some fans echo Scholes’ anger, branding the signing an embarrassment and evidence of everything wrong with United’s transfer policy. Others feel the criticism is excessive and argue the player has not been given enough time or the right environment to succeed. There are also those who believe the system, coaching, or wider instability at the club have contributed significantly to the struggles.
Regardless of where opinions fall, the reaction has been explosive. Social media has been flooded with arguments, clips highlighting costly errors, and comparisons to past failed signings, all circling around one uncomfortable question: how did such a promising move unravel so quickly?
With the January transfer window on the horizon, the scrutiny is only intensifying. There are growing questions over whether the player can salvage his United career, whether the club might consider cutting its losses, or whether this saga will simply become another expensive lesson left unlearned.
While Scholes’ words may not determine what happens next, they have undoubtedly shaped the conversation. His criticism serves as a stark warning that Manchester United cannot continue to waste money, cling to reputations, or tolerate underperformance if they are serious about returning to the top.
For the player at the centre of the storm, the situation could hardly be worse. Being branded the worst signing in the club’s history by one of its greatest ever players is a damaging label, and only consistent performances on the pitch can begin to erase it. Excuses will no longer suffice, and time is fast running out.
What began with hope has turned into frustration and regret, as yet another United transfer saga is laid bare for all to see.
