He said it right Van nistelrooy would have done better. Amorim should have come after season end now all pressure mounting on him like he doesn’t know what’s he’s doing
Robin van Persie has reignited the debate over Manchester United’s decision to bring in Ruben Amorim as manager midway through the season. The former United striker suggested the club should have kept Ruud van Nistelrooy at the helm until the campaign’s conclusion, emphasizing Van Nistelrooy’s profound understanding of the team and his ability to bring out the best in players as key advantages.
Van Persie acknowledged Amorim’s managerial talent but questioned the timing of his appointment, arguing that it has created unnecessary pressure for both the coach and the players. He noted that while Amorim has potential, he is still acclimating to the squad, and the players are facing challenges in adapting to his system. Van Persie maintained that retaining Van Nistelrooy would have ensured greater stability during this crucial period.
In his comments, Van Persie said, “No disrespect to Ruben Amorim, but I believe Van Nistelrooy was a better fit as Manchester United’s manager. He truly understood the team and knew how to get the best out of the players. Amorim, on the other hand, is still figuring things out, and that takes time.” He added that while Amorim is doing commendable work, the players’ struggles to adapt to his style have complicated the transition. He argued that delaying the managerial change until the end of the season would have been a more prudent decision.
Van Persie’s remarks have resonated with a divided fanbase, with some supporters backing Amorim as a long-term solution while others agree that Van Nistelrooy’s departure came too soon. The team’s inconsistent performances under Amorim have only added to the scrutiny, as questions persist about whether the players have fully embraced his tactical approach.
Amorim now faces the considerable challenge of proving himself in one of football’s most demanding roles. In addition to uniting a fanbase split over the managerial change, he must establish his philosophy while contending with comparisons to Van Nistelrooy, a highly respected figure at the club. Van Nistelrooy’s legacy as a tactician and leader casts a long shadow, further amplifying the pressure on Amorim to deliver results quickly.
As Manchester United navigates this transitional period, the success or failure of Amorim’s tenure will likely shape the narrative surrounding the club’s decision. Van Persie’s comments have brought the issue back into focus, fueling ongoing discussions about the club’s leadership and the timing of its choices. Whether the gamble pays off will depend heavily on the team’s ability to adapt and perform under Amorim’s guidance.
