Football News

“Manchester City signed him in 2024, he was a better Midfielder than Kelvin De Bruyne but Pep Guardiola chased him out saying he’s too old for his project- Chelsea Legend John Terry says midfielder Man City signed in 2014 was even better than Kevin De Bruyne

According to John Terry, the midfielder that Man City signed in 2014 was superior to Kevin De Bruyne.
John Terry thinks Frank Lampard was superior than Kevin De Bruyne, the master of Manchester City.

In a video with GOAL (via Twitter), the Chelsea legend was asked to draw comparisons between the former Everton manager and a number of legendary midfielders, including De Bruyne.

During his illustrious season with Manchester City in 2014–2015, Frank Lampard finished with 11 goals and six assists in all competitions.

Given his remarkable influence at the Etihad Stadium, a discussion concerning De Bruyne’s place among the greatest in English football has arisen in recent years.

However, John Terry feels that Frank Lampard, a former teammate from Chelsea and England, was a better midfielder than Kevin De Bruyne.

For me, it’s still lamps, he said to GOAL (via Twitter).

Frank Lampard was also selected by the retired centre back ahead of players like Yaya Toure, Paul Scholes, Mesut Ozil, Patrick Vieira, N’Golo Kante, Michael Essien, and Steven Gerrard.

The great Kevin De Bruyne of Manchester City has surpassed Frank Lampard.
It should come as no surprise that he prefers John Terry over Kevin De Bruyne, given that Terry dominated English football while playing for the same Chelsea team as Frank Lampard.

But we think the Belgian playwright is superior to the Englishman.

Given that both midfielders have almost won every award available in club football, it seems clear that De Bruyne is a better player overall than Lampard.

Frank Lampard is a superior goal scorer, but Kevin De Bruyne outperforms him by a wide margin when it comes to passing, creating, and dribbling.

The treble winner’s workrate is comparable to Lampard’s even on defence, making the comparison heavily biassed in favour of the former.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button